Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Relevance of Single Media Offerings and Digital Service for the Formation of Opinion

Relevance of Single Media Offerings and Digital Service for the Formation of Opinion

Search engines, network and multimedia platforms as well as instant messaging services are crucial elements of communication and information behaviour online. They function as intermediaries because they open up numerous different sources for their users with the help of filtering algorithms and bundle those into personalised information services. From a user’s point of view, they do not only manage information but also support further practices of identity and relationship management. Thus, intermediaries online contribute to the current change of the public. However, the effects for the formation of opinions on social issues has hardly been researched and understood. The relevance of single media services and digital services for the formation of opinion will be examined in a qualitative study for the Landesmedienanstalten [State Media Authorities].
Against this background, this qualitative study seeks to answer three key questions:
  1. What relevance do online intermediaries have for different user groups regarding the information on social relevant questions?
  2. How are online intermediaries and the contents, which are being communicated via intermediaries, integrated in the specific practices and networks of shaping opinions?
  3. What do different population groups know about the technical selective achievements of online intermediaries and to what extend does this (non-existing) knowledge go along with the reflected use of online intermediaries?


Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.