Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen

Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen

Schulz, W.; Dankert, K. (2016): Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen  [The Power of Information Intermediaries – Manifestations, Structures and Regulatory Options]. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen

Schulz, W.; Dankert, K. (2016): Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen  [The Power of Information Intermediaries – Manifestations, Structures and Regulatory Options]. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

About this publication

Authors

Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert • Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Year of publication

2016

RELATED KEYWORDS

regulation • intermediaries • power of opinion • Google • Facebook • opinion formation

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
PRObs_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut_ravi-sharma-RnW1taVZqm8-unsplash.jpg

New International Project

Private Ordering Observatory

In order to study how online platforms decide what can be said online, the Leibniz Institute for Media Research sets up a "Private Ordering Observatory".  

CI_Journalistische Nutzung algorithmisch geprägter Informationsumgebungen_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_1maxwell-nelson-Se9ufo2dO_g-unsplash.jpg

Method Innovation Pilot

Journalistic Use of Algorithmic Information Environments

In this computational social science project, we will use browser data donations to determine how relevant individual search engines and social media platforms are in journalists’ everyday work.
CI_BKM-EU_Medienkonferenz_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Conference within the Framework of the German EU Council Presidency

Coherent Media Order: Accompanying the EU Media Conference 2020

The institute will provide scientific support for the media conference in the context of Germany's 2020 EU Council Presidency and is analysing in advance the requirements of a modern European information order.
Facebook_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut_con-karampelas-1178814-unsplash.jpg

Rules in Digital Communication Spaces

Governance of Freedom of Expression

The social science case study gains access to Facebook's Content Policy Forum for the first time in order to examine how rules for the moderation of content, so-called "community standards", are developed.
Sharenews.png

Big Data

SHARENEWS: First Study with Facebook Data

For the first time in history, Facebook grants science access to its data records. As part of the SHARENEWS project, Dr. Cornelius Puschmann is investigating the criteria according to which Facebook users share messages on the platform.
CI_Mosene-Kettemann_Global-Media-Journal_Machtkritische-Perspektiven-auf-digitale-Emanzipationsgewinne.jpg

Saving the Digital World?

Machtkritische Perspektiven auf digitale Emanzipationsgewinne

In the Global Media Journal, Katharina Mosene and Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann look at the norms that could make the distribution of digital power more equitable.   You can download the article here (PDF, in German)   Abstract The internet has long ceased to be a utopian counter-draft t...
CI_Hoelig_Behre_Mediaperspektiven_clean.jpg

Politicians on Social Media

​Facebook- und Twitter-Nutzung der Kandidierenden zur Bundestagswahl 2021

In the current issue of "Media Perspektiven", PD Dr. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt describes how the candidates for the 2021 Bundestag election used social media. Most important findings In the 2021 federal election, candidates significantly expanded their social media activities compared to the...
CI_Amélie-Pia-Heldt-Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Publication

Prozedurale Vermessung: Das Kuratieren kommunikativer Räume durch soziale Netzwerke

In the journal Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht - ZUM, Amélie Heldt and Prof. Dr. Moritz Hennemann (University of Passau) write about the Facebook rulings of the Federal Court of Justice.   Heldt, A.; Hennemann, M. (2021): Prozedurale Vermessung: Das Kuratieren kommunikative...
CI_Clara-Iglesias-Keller_Regulating-Disinformation.jpg

Journal Article

Don’t Shoot the Message: Regulating Disinformation Beyond Content

In the Brazilian journal for public law "Revista Direito Público", Dr Clara Iglesias Keller writes about the regulation of disinformation. The article is published as open access.   Download article (PDF) Iglesias Keller, C. (2021): Don’t Shoot the Message: Regulating D...
CI_Kettemann-Schulz-Fertmann-ZfR.jpg

Article in Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik

Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der Plattformregulierung

In the journal Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, PD Matthias C. Kettemann, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Martin Fertmann ask whether the digital legal acts planned by the European Commission can live up to their claims. Kettemann, M. C.; Schulz, W.; Fertmann, M. (2021): Anspruch und Wirklichkeit...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!