Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Digitale time-outs für Trump: Der Anfang vom Ende der privilegierten Behandlung von Amtsinhaber*innen durch soziale Netzwerke?

Digitale time-outs für Trump: Der Anfang vom Ende der privilegierten Behandlung von Amtsinhaber*innen durch soziale Netzwerke?

In their contribution to JuWiss, media lawyers Martin Fertmann and Keno Potthast discuss whether Donald Trump's Twitter ban heralds a change in the previously privileged treatment of public officials on digital platforms.
 
Read the article here (in German)
 

Abstract
After soon-to-be former US President Trump incited supporters to storm the US Capitol on 6 January, also via social media, and then relativised it, numerous platforms have taken action against Trump. Facebook Inc. suspended Trump from its Facebook and Instagram accounts "indefinitely, but at least until the end of his presidency", as did Snapchat and the streaming platform Twitch, TikTok removed videos of the president's speeches (the president does not have an account there for well-known reasons), and his favourite platform Twitter initially suspended his account @realDonaldTrump temporarily, only to follow suit after the other platforms became aware of the permanent suspensions "because of the risk of further incitement to violence".
 

Fertmann, M.; Potthast, K. C. (2021): Digitale time-outs für Trump: Der Anfang vom Ende der privilegierten Behandlung von Amtsinhaber*innen durch soziale Netzwerke? [Digital Time-Outs for Trump: The Beginning of the End of Privileged Treatment of Incumbents by Social Networks?]. In: JuWissBlog No. 5/2021, 18.01.2021, https://www.juwiss.de/05-2021/.

Digitale time-outs für Trump: Der Anfang vom Ende der privilegierten Behandlung von Amtsinhaber*innen durch soziale Netzwerke?

In their contribution to JuWiss, media lawyers Martin Fertmann and Keno Potthast discuss whether Donald Trump's Twitter ban heralds a change in the previously privileged treatment of public officials on digital platforms.
 
Read the article here (in German)
 

Abstract
After soon-to-be former US President Trump incited supporters to storm the US Capitol on 6 January, also via social media, and then relativised it, numerous platforms have taken action against Trump. Facebook Inc. suspended Trump from its Facebook and Instagram accounts "indefinitely, but at least until the end of his presidency", as did Snapchat and the streaming platform Twitch, TikTok removed videos of the president's speeches (the president does not have an account there for well-known reasons), and his favourite platform Twitter initially suspended his account @realDonaldTrump temporarily, only to follow suit after the other platforms became aware of the permanent suspensions "because of the risk of further incitement to violence".
 

Fertmann, M.; Potthast, K. C. (2021): Digitale time-outs für Trump: Der Anfang vom Ende der privilegierten Behandlung von Amtsinhaber*innen durch soziale Netzwerke? [Digital Time-Outs for Trump: The Beginning of the End of Privileged Treatment of Incumbents by Social Networks?]. In: JuWissBlog No. 5/2021, 18.01.2021, https://www.juwiss.de/05-2021/.

About this publication

Year of publication

2021

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!