Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Internet Governance

Internet Governance

In his article for the anthology "IT-Recht [IT Law]", PD. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann describes the instruments and actors of Internet Governance.

You can order the anthology (in German) here

Summary
Of particular relevance to Internet governance are international law and the human rights protection regime, which form important elements of the normative framework in which governance initiatives can unfold. The principles of Internet governance play a central role in the specification of the standards relevant to Internet governance.

Through the interlocking of soft law and binding law, national and international standards, technical principles and moral claims as well as their elaboration and application by states, civil society and the private sector, Internet governance has proven to be a laboratory for the legally relevant management of goods and resources (and claims) in the global public interest. The principles of Internet governance (and its regulatory objective) are essentially undisputed; however, their operationalization is not. The central regulatory objective of Internet governance remains to guarantee the stability and security of the Internet as a resource in the global public interest. In view of the importance of the Internet, this must be expressed more clearly in governance discourses.
 
Kettemann, M.C. (2020): Internet Governance. In: D. Jahnel, P. Mader, E. Staudegger. (eds.), IT-Recht [IT Law]. Vienna: Verlag Österreich, pp. 47-73.

Internet Governance

In his article for the anthology "IT-Recht [IT Law]", PD. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann describes the instruments and actors of Internet Governance.

You can order the anthology (in German) here

Summary
Of particular relevance to Internet governance are international law and the human rights protection regime, which form important elements of the normative framework in which governance initiatives can unfold. The principles of Internet governance play a central role in the specification of the standards relevant to Internet governance.

Through the interlocking of soft law and binding law, national and international standards, technical principles and moral claims as well as their elaboration and application by states, civil society and the private sector, Internet governance has proven to be a laboratory for the legally relevant management of goods and resources (and claims) in the global public interest. The principles of Internet governance (and its regulatory objective) are essentially undisputed; however, their operationalization is not. The central regulatory objective of Internet governance remains to guarantee the stability and security of the Internet as a resource in the global public interest. In view of the importance of the Internet, this must be expressed more clearly in governance discourses.
 
Kettemann, M.C. (2020): Internet Governance. In: D. Jahnel, P. Mader, E. Staudegger. (eds.), IT-Recht [IT Law]. Vienna: Verlag Österreich, pp. 47-73.

About this publication

Year of publication

2020

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!