Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Konvergenz und regulatorische Folgen

Konvergenz und regulatorische Folgen

Kluth, W.; Schulz, W. (2014): Konvergenz und regulatorische Folgen. Gutachten im Auftrag der Rundfunkkommission der Länder [Convergence and the Regulatory Consequences. Report as Commissioned by the Länder Broadcasting Commission]. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, Oktober 2014 (Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut, No. 30) (pdf-file). https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71857

Konvergenz und regulatorische Folgen

Kluth, W.; Schulz, W. (2014): Konvergenz und regulatorische Folgen. Gutachten im Auftrag der Rundfunkkommission der Länder [Convergence and the Regulatory Consequences. Report as Commissioned by the Länder Broadcasting Commission]. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, Oktober 2014 (Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut, No. 30) (pdf-file). https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71857

About this publication

Authors

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Year of publication

2014

RELATED KEYWORDS

regulation • Neue Regulierungsformen • media law • convergence

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
CI_BKM-EU_Medienkonferenz_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Conference within the Framework of the German EU Council Presidency

Coherent Media Order: Accompanying the EU Media Conference 2020

The institute will provide scientific support for the media conference in the context of Germany's 2020 EU Council Presidency and is analysing in advance the requirements of a modern European information order.
Diss_Amélie-Pia-Heldt_WirkungderMeinungsfreiheit_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Effect of Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

Is user-generated content on private communication platforms protected by freedom of expression? In her PhD project, Amélie Heldt focuses on the effect of the fundamental right on freedom of expression on the Internet.
229908_Vorsprung-durch-Rechtsbruch_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Advantage by Breach of Law?

Market participants violate existing rules governing the media sector in order secure a competitive advantage. In his dissertation, Martin Lose examines judicial subjects that interface the breach of law according to § 3a UWG (Act Against Unfair Practices) and the information and communication...
229910_Haftungsprivilegien_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Legal Concept of Interference Liability

In which cases is a WiFi provider liable for illegal downloads made by a third party using its internet access? Is YouTube to be held responsible for uploads infringing the copyright? Such questions cannot be answered conclusively by the written law and are a solved by the construction of interferen...
229911_Algorithmen_Persoenlichkeitsrecht_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Legal Treatment of Algorithms

Every app, every website, every search query uses algorithms. In his PhD project, Felix Krupar analyses the legal classification of algorithmic communication.  
CI_Staatsferne der Medien und Staat im Diskurs_Tobias Mast.jpg

Article in "Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht"

Staatsferne der Medien und Staat im Diskurs

In the "Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht" [Journal of Copyright and Media Law], Tobias Mast discusses the incongruities between the constitutional figure of state neutrality of the media and the jurisdiction on the public relations of state agencies, which has recent...
CI_Recht im Metaverse.jpg

Rules for Immersive Worlds

Einführung in die Regulierung der Metaverse

Matthias C. Kettemann, Caroline Böck and Martin Müller examine selected legal issues of rule application in the metaverse and look at future developments. Excerpt The metaverse is phenomenologically diverse; technically complex; economically endowed with much potential; challenging tradit...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity.jpg

Editorship

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes. The anthology is available as an open access publicatio...
CI_JMS-Report_2022.jpg

Jugendmedienschutz-Report 6/22

Folgen der sich wandelnden Regulierungsansätze im Jugendmedienschutz

Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Sünje Andresen and Neda Wysocki have published an article in the current Youth Media Protection Report. In this article, they address the systematic changes in the legal protection of minors from harmful media and the associated control advantages for interaction and communi...
CI_Tiedeke_Statification.jpg

Understanding Digital Corporations as States?

Self-Statification of Corporate Actors?: Tracing Modes of Corporate Engagements with Public International Law

In order to understand the role of large digital corporations in international lawmaking on the internet from a jurisprudential perspective, Anna Sophia Tiedeke applies Michel Foucault's model of "stateification" (Étatisation). This article is published as an open access paper b...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!