Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Normative Technologie in sozialen Netzwerkdiensten

Dankert, K. (2015): Normative Technologie in sozialen Netzwerkdiensten – Neue Machtstrukturen als Anreiz für einen Paradigmenwechsel der Kommunikationsregulierung? [Normative Technology in Social Network Services - Do New Power Structures Incite a Paradigm Shift in Communication Regulation?]. In: Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (KritV), 98(1), pp. 50-73.

Dankert, K. (2015): Normative Technologie in sozialen Netzwerkdiensten – Neue Machtstrukturen als Anreiz für einen Paradigmenwechsel der Kommunikationsregulierung? [Normative Technology in Social Network Services - Do New Power Structures Incite a Paradigm Shift in Communication Regulation?]. In: Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (KritV), 98(1), pp. 50-73.

About this publication

Authors

Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert

Year of publication

2015

RELATED KEYWORDS

regulation • Neue Regulierungsformen • code

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
229910_Haftungsprivilegien_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Legal Concept of Interference Liability

In which cases is a WiFi provider liable for illegal downloads made by a third party using its internet access? Is YouTube to be held responsible for uploads infringing the copyright? Such questions cannot be answered conclusively by the written law and are a solved by the construction of interferen...
219909_Staatliche-Informationstaetigkeit_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Legal Principles of Information Activities of the State

Unlike its citizens, the state cannot lean on the basic right of free speech when it comes to its communciation. In his PhD project, Tobias Mast exmaines the legal requirements of the state’s communication with its citizens.  
229911_Algorithmen_Persoenlichkeitsrecht_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Legal Treatment of Algorithms

Every app, every website, every search query uses algorithms. In his PhD project, Felix Krupar analyses the legal classification of algorithmic communication.  
229907_Code-Internetregulierung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Cooperation with HIIG

Regulating Code

The more time people spend online, the more important the code that controls their behaviour on digital platforms will become. This factor especially competes with regulation by law and poses new challenges to it.  
321401_HERMES_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Media Regulation of On Demand Services

HERMES

Regulation designed primarily for linear media such as traditional scheduled television services has not adequately kept pace with the growth of non-linear media and the Internet. Even though traditional linear media may still be strong and even in the dominant role regarding overall media consumpti...
CI_Recht im Metaverse.jpg

Rules for Immersive Worlds

Einführung in die Regulierung der Metaverse

Matthias C. Kettemann, Caroline Böck and Martin Müller examine selected legal issues of rule application in the metaverse and look at future developments. Excerpt The metaverse is phenomenologically diverse; technically complex; economically endowed with much potential; challenging tradit...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity.jpg

Editorship

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes. The anthology is available as an open access publicatio...
CI_JMS-Report_2022.jpg

Jugendmedienschutz-Report 6/22

Folgen der sich wandelnden Regulierungsansätze im Jugendmedienschutz

Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Sünje Andresen and Neda Wysocki have published an article in the current Youth Media Protection Report. In this article, they address the systematic changes in the legal protection of minors from harmful media and the associated control advantages for interaction and communi...
CI_Tiedeke_Statification.jpg

Understanding Digital Corporations as States?

Self-Statification of Corporate Actors?: Tracing Modes of Corporate Engagements with Public International Law

In order to understand the role of large digital corporations in international lawmaking on the internet from a jurisprudential perspective, Anna Sophia Tiedeke applies Michel Foucault's model of "stateification" (Étatisation). This article is published as an open access paper b...
CI_Clara-Iglesias-Keller_Regulating-Disinformation.jpg

Journal Article

Don’t Shoot the Message: Regulating Disinformation Beyond Content

In the Brazilian journal for public law "Revista Direito Público", Dr Clara Iglesias Keller writes about the regulation of disinformation. The article is published as open access.   Download article (PDF) Iglesias Keller, C. (2021): Don’t Shoot the Message: Regulating D...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!