Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter's Fact-Checking Indication

The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter's Fact-Checking Indication

In her article in the open access journal Internet Policy Review, Amélie Heldt writes about freedom of expression in the United States and the consequences of the US President's executive order on preventing online censorship.

You can read the entire article here

Abstract
While we consider social media platforms to constitute important parts of the digital public sphere - they host much of our daily communication - and subsequently expecting them to take responsibility and protect democratic values, we refute the idea that platforms become arbiters of speech. In other words, we criticise the platforms’ power over online speech but we want them to fix problems that go beyond corporate responsibility.

Heldt, A. (2020): The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter's Fact-Checking Indication. In: Internet Policy Review, Op-Ed, published on 4 June 2020. online: https://policyreview.info/articles/news/president-and-free-speech-consequences-twitters-fact-checking-indication/1483

The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter's Fact-Checking Indication

In her article in the open access journal Internet Policy Review, Amélie Heldt writes about freedom of expression in the United States and the consequences of the US President's executive order on preventing online censorship.

You can read the entire article here

Abstract
While we consider social media platforms to constitute important parts of the digital public sphere - they host much of our daily communication - and subsequently expecting them to take responsibility and protect democratic values, we refute the idea that platforms become arbiters of speech. In other words, we criticise the platforms’ power over online speech but we want them to fix problems that go beyond corporate responsibility.

Heldt, A. (2020): The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter's Fact-Checking Indication. In: Internet Policy Review, Op-Ed, published on 4 June 2020. online: https://policyreview.info/articles/news/president-and-free-speech-consequences-twitters-fact-checking-indication/1483

About this publication

Year of publication

2020

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!