Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Zusammenhaltssensibler Journalismus

Zusammenhaltssensibler Journalismus

A research group at the HBI discussed the role of journalism in social cohesion with experts from journalism, science, integration work and NGOs. Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer and Verena Albert  present the findings in this impulse paper.
 
Loosen, Wiebke; Reimer, Julius; & Albert, Verena (2021): Zusammenhaltssensibler Journalismus [Cohesion-Sensitive Journalism]. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut, October 2021 (Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut | FGZ Results No. 60) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.75462
 
You can download the discussion paper here (PDF)

 

Abstract
Social cohesion is discussed in many areas of society: in politics as well as in academia, but also in the broader public. One of the virulent questions in this context is repeatedly the role of journalism and the common notion that journalism (from a democratic theory perspective) should contribute to social cohesion - and that it can strengthen or weaken it. However, there is no shared understanding of whether and how journalism or journalistic reporting influences cohesion and whether and in what way journalism is at all responsible for strengthening the cohesion of a society.
 
For this reason, the present study of the RISC section Hamburg turned this into an empirical question and asked various actors inside and outside journalism about their understanding of the connection between social cohesion and journalism. For this purpose, four online group discussions were conducted, each with five to six experts from the fields of journalism, science and cohesion practice.
 
It became clear that although the respondents consider social cohesion a desirable state to which journalism can contribute, there is no agreement on whether this should also be an explicit goal of journalism. The challenges identified in the group discussions that "cohesion-sensitive journalism" faces are systematised along the dimensions of accessibility, imageability and the ability of society to engage in dialogue. The impulse paper shows the many facets of the relationship between "social cohesion and journalism", raises awareness of the associated areas of tension and challenges, bundles the practical examples and sources on the topic mentioned in the group discussions and develops practical implications and recommendations for journalists and other interested parties.
 

Zusammenhaltssensibler Journalismus

A research group at the HBI discussed the role of journalism in social cohesion with experts from journalism, science, integration work and NGOs. Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer and Verena Albert  present the findings in this impulse paper.
 
Loosen, Wiebke; Reimer, Julius; & Albert, Verena (2021): Zusammenhaltssensibler Journalismus [Cohesion-Sensitive Journalism]. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut, October 2021 (Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut | FGZ Results No. 60) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.75462
 
You can download the discussion paper here (PDF)

 

Abstract
Social cohesion is discussed in many areas of society: in politics as well as in academia, but also in the broader public. One of the virulent questions in this context is repeatedly the role of journalism and the common notion that journalism (from a democratic theory perspective) should contribute to social cohesion - and that it can strengthen or weaken it. However, there is no shared understanding of whether and how journalism or journalistic reporting influences cohesion and whether and in what way journalism is at all responsible for strengthening the cohesion of a society.
 
For this reason, the present study of the RISC section Hamburg turned this into an empirical question and asked various actors inside and outside journalism about their understanding of the connection between social cohesion and journalism. For this purpose, four online group discussions were conducted, each with five to six experts from the fields of journalism, science and cohesion practice.
 
It became clear that although the respondents consider social cohesion a desirable state to which journalism can contribute, there is no agreement on whether this should also be an explicit goal of journalism. The challenges identified in the group discussions that "cohesion-sensitive journalism" faces are systematised along the dimensions of accessibility, imageability and the ability of society to engage in dialogue. The impulse paper shows the many facets of the relationship between "social cohesion and journalism", raises awareness of the associated areas of tension and challenges, bundles the practical examples and sources on the topic mentioned in the group discussions and develops practical implications and recommendations for journalists and other interested parties.
 

About this publication

Year of publication

2021

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!